The third debate carried the themes of defense, security, international relations, globalization, and foreign policy
Yesterday’s debate followed the first and second debates that took place in Jakarta on December 12 and December 22 . The next debates are scheduled for January 21 and February 4.
The ongoing campaign period, initiated on November 28, 2023, is set to continue until February 10, 2024.
Ganjar Pranowo’s perspective, as presented during the third presidential debate, underscores the significance of redefining Indonesia’s foreign policy to align with national aspirations and fortify the state. Emphasizing the need for strategic decision-making and prioritization, Ganjar highlights the crucial role of a revamped active and free foreign policy framework. His vision involves bolstering Indonesia’s diplomatic infrastructure, with a focus on enhancing the role of ambassadors and diplomats. Ganjar envisions these representatives playing a pivotal role in addressing issues of national economic interest, particularly in attracting global investors to invest in Indonesia. By assigning diplomats the mandate to navigate economic concerns, he aims to stimulate foreign investment that, in turn, contributes to job creation, aligning with the broader goal of fostering employment opportunities for the populace. Ganjar’s analysis reflects a comprehensive approach that intertwines diplomacy, economic development, and job creation, positioning foreign policy as a dynamic tool to advance Indonesia’s national interests and aspirations on the global stage.
Prabowo Subianto’s stance on the importance of a robust national defense, as articulated during the third presidential debate in Jakarta, reflects a strategic vision for safeguarding Indonesia’s wealth and fostering prosperity. Emphasizing the necessity of a strong defense system, Prabowo draws a direct link between national defense, as outlined in the 1945 Constitution, and the protection of the entire nation and its people. Advocating a return to foundational principles and national aspirations, he underscores the constitutional mandate to prioritize the defense function of the state. Prabowo’s assertion that protecting state wealth is crucial for the well-being of the populace and the creation of sustainable employment underscores a commitment to ensure that the benefits of the nation’s resources are retained domestically rather than accruing solely to foreign interests. By contextualizing historical interventions and resource exploitation, he frames the imperative for a resilient defense as a means to guard against external threats and preserve Indonesia’s vast and rich natural wealth. In essence, Prabowo’s analysis underscores the symbiotic relationship between a strong national defense, economic prosperity, and the protection of Indonesia’s resources for the benefit of its citizens.
Anies Rasyid Baswedan advocates for an assertive and influential role for Indonesia on the global stage, positioning the country as a decisive force in directing international affairs towards prosperity. During the third debate in Jakarta, Anies emphasized the need for Indonesia to transcend its historical role as a mere spectator in international affairs, asserting that the nation should actively contribute to global and regional peace and prosperity. Anies outlined a multifaceted approach, emphasizing the enhancement of Indonesia’s economic strength, cultural appeal, artistic endeavors, and defense capabilities. Central to his vision is the proactive involvement of the Indonesian President as the diplomatic leader on the international stage, drawing inspiration from the nation’s founding fathers. Anies underlines the significance of supporting the Indonesian diaspora and migrant workers, recognizing their potential to contribute significantly to the nation’s global standing. In essence, Anies’s analysis envisions Indonesia as a proactive global player, leveraging its economic, cultural, and diplomatic strengths to shape a world marked by peace and prosperity, aligning with the principles set forth by the nation’s founders.
Conclusion
The third debate for the 2024 presidential election played a pivotal role in aiding voters to make informed decisions regarding their preferred candidates as the election date, slated for February 14, draws near. This platform provided an essential forum for candidates to articulate their visions, policies, and responses to critical issues, enabling the electorate to assess and compare the contenders. The insights shared during this debate contributed significantly to shaping public opinion, will help voters to navigate the complex landscape of political choices. The information and perspectives presented in the third debate will serve as a crucial resource for citizens to make thoughtful and well-informed decisions to cast their ballots.
