Rome, April 29, 2026 – The Europe Today: More than a year after Italian magistrates formally requested information from Israeli authorities regarding the alleged use of Graphite spyware in Italy, investigators have yet to receive any substantive response, according to an investigation by Wired Italia.
The report reveals that despite official requests, judicial authorities in Italy are still waiting for any form of cooperation—be it partial disclosures, redacted documents, or formal engagement—from Paragon Solutions, the developer of the Graphite surveillance software.
Spyware Allegations and Investigation
Paragon Solutions, founded in 2019, produces Graphite, a sophisticated spyware tool capable of infiltrating smartphones and extracting sensitive data—including messages, contacts, and images—without the user’s knowledge.
The controversy emerged in early 2025 when it was discovered that Graphite had been used to target individuals within Italy, including journalists and members of civil society. The revelations sparked widespread political concern and led to judicial inquiries aimed at determining both the perpetrators of the cyberattacks and the authorities responsible for authorizing the deployment of such surveillance tools.
Lack of Cooperation Raises Concerns
At the time of the scandal, Paragon Solutions publicly expressed its willingness to cooperate with investigations into potential misuse of its technology. However, according to Italian magistrates, that commitment has not materialized into tangible action.
Judicial authorities have sought technical confirmation of the spyware attacks, information on the entities that purchased and deployed the software, and documentation related to the infections. To date, no meaningful response has been provided by the company or the relevant Israeli authorities.
Ongoing Legal and Political Implications
The continued lack of cooperation has raised serious concerns about accountability, transparency, and the regulation of surveillance technologies. Italian investigators remain unable to advance key aspects of the case without access to critical technical data and corporate disclosures.
As the inquiry continues, the case underscores broader international challenges surrounding the oversight of cyber-surveillance tools and the responsibilities of companies involved in their development and distribution.
