Stockholm, June 10, 2026 – The Europe Today: Sweden’s Security Service (Säpo) has come under criticism after a media report revealed that a journalist was able to gain access to a property co-owned by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and his wife, Birgitta Ed, raising concerns about the security arrangements surrounding the country’s leader.
According to an investigation published by Aftonbladet, a reporter successfully entered the prime ministerial couple’s property in Flen municipality after registering as a volunteer for a maintenance day at Fållökna Manor. The estate was reportedly purchased in 2023 by Birgitta Ed and entrepreneur Göran Thorstenson and is rented to a foundation that Ed helped establish. The newspaper stated that the prime ministerial couple co-owns one of the manor’s wings.
The reporter reportedly registered using a false surname and an AI-altered photograph. After receiving confirmation via email, she attended the event six days later.
The report alleged that upon arrival, security personnel did not request identification or conduct a search of the reporter’s belongings. Volunteers were subsequently assigned various tasks, including activities led by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson himself.
During her visit, the reporter was allegedly exposed to details regarding the couple’s daily routines. According to Aftonbladet, Birgitta Ed also showed the journalist the couple’s bedroom and left her unattended upstairs, inviting her to look around.
The revelations have sparked criticism from security experts. Jörgen Holmlund, a security specialist with extensive law enforcement experience, told Swedish media that ensuring the safety of protected individuals remains the responsibility of Säpo regardless of the personal views of those under protection.
Despite the controversy, Prime Minister Kristersson expressed confidence in the security arrangements, telling Swedish broadcaster SVT Nyheter that he felt secure with the protection provided.
In response, Säpo stated that it takes the protection of the prime minister and his family very seriously. However, the agency declined to comment on whether any shortcomings had occurred in the handling of the incident.
The case has prompted renewed debate in Sweden over the effectiveness of security procedures surrounding senior government officials and their families.
